Okay: the
results are in, and they are predictably surprising! Here is – roughly - what
each of the candidates in the first round of the French Presidential elections
scored yesterday:
Hollande 28 %
Sarkozy 27 %
Le Pen (fille) 18 %
Mélenchon 11 %
Bayrou 9 %
In short:
François Hollande won the first round. Consequently everybody still counts on an
embarrassing defeat for Mr Sarkozy in the second and last round on May 6. Yet I
am not convinced. Let us face some dry but telling facts. Yes, Mr Hollande won
the first bout, but he did not do at all so well as the polls predicted. He
didn’t reap the promised 32 or 33 % of the vote, but only 28. Meanwhile, Mr Sarkozy
did exactly as the polls foretold: a lean, but respectable, 27 %. The actual
difference between the two could not be smaller. For all practical purposes
it’s a tie. And that means that Mr Sarkozy has a chance of bouncing back.
So the polls got
it a little wrong. Small surprise! It happens three times out of ten. But there
is more! The polls got it absolutely, absurdly, inexplicably and unforgivably
wrong when it came to the showing of Ms Le Pen, whose results comes close to 20
%, i.e. 7 million voters. Why did the polls not foresee this? Well, for the
simple reason of a deliberate blind eye.
Ms Le Pen’s
electorate consists of that old-time, unfashionable, un-hip, supposedly
obsolete segment of society that all experts, commentators and journalists are
happy to overlook, because in their eyes Modern Society would be better off if
it did not exist: the unsophisticated, low-educated, average-wage blue collar white
male, who dislikes immigration (particularly of the Islamic variety), the
European Union and artistic left-leaning bourgeois elites (a.k.a. the Radical
Chic, of which there are many in France!)
I don’t know if
you noticed, dear reader, but over the last 20 or 30 years the European
movements that lean on this segment have been declared dead and out-dated half
a dozen times already, yet with every true election they grow and score better!
This you rarely see reflected in the predictions. Why not? Because there is a strong
social stigma on such parties as the PVV in Holland or the Front National in
France. Folks who vote for these rogue parties, the media never tire of telling
their audience, are stupid and racist and inspired only by irrational fear. Brutes
and yokels, in short. Despicable boors. Small wonder, then, that when
interviewed by the polling bureaus, a considerable number of them are loath to
admit to their true preferences. But once in the secrecy of the voting booth,
they feel no such scruples to vote for their preferred rogue party candidate.
Ecco the little surprise that each recent election has brought.
So where will
these voters go in the second round on May 6th? With the same jolly wishful
thinking, electoral experts now predict that these churls will stay home or cast
a blank vote. If so, Mr Sarkozy is doomed. Unfortunately, these experts are the
exact same ones who were unable to predict the success of Ms Le Pen, which
shows you how little they understand of that segment of the electorate and how flawed
their data really are. This means there may well be another surprise in the
offing.
In the wake of
the Mereh murders, Mr Sarkozy made a highly publicized show of anti-terrorist
activity. This was a well-calculated electoral move, which predictably did
little to attract Front National voters in the first round, but may pay off
handsomely in the second when Ms Le Pen does not run. Are they disgusted enough
with the sitting president in the Élysée to wish him to go to Inferno? Or might
they consider him the lesser of two evils? You tell me. But if I were of that
mind-set, dear reader, I wonder how happy I would be with the prospect of
having an immigrant-friendly, EU-adoring, alternative-lifestyle stimulating New
Left Socialist president running my life for the next five years...
Oh, and another funny
one: in the whole 54-year history of the 5th republic, there have
been seven presidents. Only one of them – Mr Mitterrand – was a socialist.
We are living in
interesting times.
Hey, Alfie, I completely agree. Which is not something I can say very often . . . . . .
ReplyDeleteI feel honored. Now let's see if we're both dumb dunces...
DeleteYours, Alfred BM
PS I'd get mighty worried if you DID agree with me regularly...