Yesterday the largest part of the European electorate voted… no, not
with their feet, but with their backsides! Out of disinterest or – as in my own
case – out of deliberate passivity in protest against the anti-democratic
nature of the EU, they decided to stay home. To vote in a democracy is a solemn
civic duty. But to vote for a sham parliament only legitimizes the robbery of
democratic rights, and hollows out the people’s political entitlement.
Participation in these 2014 Eulections was a miserable 43.1 %. This
was immediately pounded upon by the Europhile politicians and media as a
triumph. You see: participation is the last elections was lower. Much lower. A
full… 0.1 % ! Yes indeed! You astound reader, I am sure you do. The popularity
of the Union has risen vastly…
Of course, before we take this as a sign of growing EU-love, let’s
not forget that the number is a little inflated, since in various countries of
the Union (Belgium, Luxemburg and little Malta), the voter has no choice.
Voting is obligatory. Thus, 90 % of voters turned out in Belgium and Luxemburg,
where you get fined if you stay away. Of course these countries only contain
some 2 % of the European population, but it still means a distortion; therefore,
to take those 43.1 % as a reliable measure of Union patriotism is pretty
questionable.
Vintage Europhiles like Mr Verhofstadt and Mr Barroso were quick to
jump upon the rostrum to proclaim a Victory for the European Project. You see,
Euro-hostile parties had only scored about 225 out of 750-something seats in
the sham parliament, less than a third! And if you compared that with all the
other parties put together – never mind that it then contained such incompatible
bedfellows as conservatives, liberals, socialists and greens – the pro-European
vote was clearly overwhelming.
It is – yet once again - quite an exercise in shamelessly staying blind
and deaf to what is really going on. After all, is there not reason to argue
that many of the near 60 % of abstainers are clearly lukewarm, if not straightforward
hostile, to this megalomaniac project? One reason to think so is that they
stayed home despite the most vehement campaigns to get them to come vote.
Another that, in the past, WHENEVER a proposal was put to them in referendum by
our Brussels Masters, the answer was inevitably a resounding NO. A rejection
which in all cases – France, the Netherlands, Ireland various times – was then
cheerfully ignored by the hollow men in power. The Project Must Go On… Some
democracy!
Meanwhile, across this disjointed Union of ours, weird, or roguish,
or extremist parties have not only grown substantially, but in various places
have simply won the elections,
becoming the first political force on the national scale. In France, the Front
National won with over 25 %. In Britain, the far more respectable Ukip took 30
%. In Greece, the radical left wing Syriza scored 26.5 %, apart from a scary 9
% for the SA-style Golden Dawn bunch… Much the same, if not as scary, took
place in Italy, in Austria, in Denmark, in Hungary, and in the Netherlands,
where Europhiles enthusiastically danced over the TV screen to the news that Mr
Wilders’ PVV had ‘only’ scored 4 seats and 13 % of the vote; the party had been
expected to win 5 seats and 20 %. Some Victory! King Pyrrhus could not have
improved upon Europhile performance!
Oh, it is such a pleasure to see such parties back in the European
political landscape again, after an unbearable absence of near 70 years! We
have missed them so badly, yearned so deeply for their crackpot racial
theories, their love of Leaders, their slash, burn and strip economics and
their ‘solutions’ to the problems caused by crime! Let us all rejoice that we may
soon see easy answers to complicated problems again, clad in uniforms and
boots, holding rallies and razzias, burning books and smashing shop windows...
But to whom do we really owe their rise, dear readers? To the evil
intentions and the stupidity of the voters? You must be a true democrat if you
believe that… ‘The electorate is always right,’ I hear you mumble, ‘as long as
they vote the way I want them to…’ The attitude makes one think of a T-Ford in
another colour than black…
The Eurochamber's predecessor: the Weimar Parliament |
Let me try to explain it one more time. We owe the rise of
suspicious movements to the boundless arrogance of the respectable political parties.
All of these, of all political convictions, left, centre and right, are blindly
pro-EU and want an ever closer Union, with ever more powers, ever more money,
and ever more countries. However: an overwhelming part of the European
populations wants a stop to this tendency. They want the EU to be pulled to a
halt. They want no more steps towards a Federal Europe, less power to Brussels,
less money to its institutions, and no more new countries for a long long while
(no Ukraine, no Turkey, no Tunesia or Morocco).
And now comes the crux of the matter: if you wish to vote against
the automatic Ever More Europe, whom do you vote for? All the respectable
parties want more of it. That leaves… Well, you guessed it.
If you wish to get rid of the fascists, then heed the wishes of the people,
you oafs!
Sadly, the European leadership in Brussels, and their elected
lackeys in the various capitals, have already given unmistakable signs that
they will not heed these things. That they will not listen, will once again
ignore the message, will go forward with what they tell themselves is good for
the people in spite of the people. They also are great democrats…
And how do you think the electorate is going to react to that??
Different, right?
Oh, yes: we are living in Interesting Times. Brace yourselves, dear readers.
We ain’t seen nothing yet…
I am taking applications for The Revolutionary Party. You don't have to be violent but it might help.
ReplyDeleteWill you pour red wine at the Revolutionary Party??
ReplyDeletePlease, someone tell me what's so special / important about the nation state.
ReplyDeleteOr, will we continue to whine or will we see red and demand change by ALL, casting our vote???
ReplyDeleteAs a pattern for living, I would prefer Mediaeval Scandinavian laws, in preference even to our Common Law. The Napoleonic Code you can stick where the sun does not shine; it just encourages and rewards corruption. Legal traditions post Xtianity, led to far worse punishments, such as executions, brandings and imprisonments.
ReplyDeletehttp://sealvikings.wikispaces.com/Viking+Crime+and+Punishments