I made my peace with young Ivana today, dear reader. It could not be
helped, for remorse was eating away at me; without provocation I had treated
her brutally; and it does not do to censor the young for their honest and
valuable opinions. Also, I stood in some need of her assistance because neither I
nor that little brat of her brother managed to make heads or tails of the stats
that came out of our experiment with Random Terms of Good and Evil.
Fortunately, sweet, sharp-witted Ivana is a merciful girl of impeccable
character, who does not deem it below her dignity to forgive a grumpy old fool
for his inexcusable rudeness. In exchange for a firm promise, which I herewith publicize
for the whole world to witness, never again to insult, belittle, humiliate, affront,
offend, abuse or edit her, she has
agreed to study the stat numbers and enlighten me with her incomparable
interpretation. To that purpose, I gratefully received the following break-down
from her yesterday midnight (which I translate integrally from her most elegant
Portuguese).
Mr Mittington,
At your request I scrutinized the
statistical returns of your sorry blog for 5 and 6 March last. It needs no
saying that We Are Not Impressed. It is obvious that the entire exercise was
futile, and the scientific method only slightly less pathetic than the final
outcome.
On March 5 last you published on your
sorry blog 50 ‘random terms’ of a positive nature, such as love, peace, modesty
and more such expressions with which you are barely familiar. During the
subsequent 24-hour period, a mere 36 internauts (out of roughly 1 billion
digitally active worldwide) took a pageview. No more than 6 of these cared to peruse
your Random Terms of Good and Beauty.
You may yelp, in anguish, that that is
a miserable return. And you are right. However, it is not HALF as miserable
as the returns for the 50 random terms of Evil and Ugliness which you posted
the following day, March 6. Only 20 people of bad taste and vulgarity wasted
their quality time on your sorry blog that day, of which NOT A SINGLE ONE
(zilch, niente, nada) took a look at your rambling collection of preferred expressions.
I do not need to say more. But I chose
to do so, adding some personal thoughts. It may be obvious, Mr Mittington, that
you totally fail to strike a chord – or even a single string – on that grand resonant
harp that is modern artistically proficient Youth. This cannot be helped. You
are ancient, outmoded and vengeful of character. As such there is no hope for
you or your sorry blog.
If, however, you persist in your forlorn attempts to make a name in the modern world (through fame, not infamy, I can
only hope against my better judgement!) then you will have to mend your ways.
This of course starts with a Positive
Attitude and the intake of herbal tea instead of crude liquor (as I know
you indulge in immodestly every night from 11 a.m. onward).
Beyond that, I would suggest you
shorten the length of your interminable postings, find more popular themes than
greasy sauces, sick humour and slanders regarding the fine Brussels men and women who
are trying to save our continent from the International Monetary Complex, and
promote yourself through the Social Media such as Facebook, Twitter and
Google+. As you will have noticed from your dismally failed experiment: hoping
to attract readers by offering rude language to their search machines generates
no response at all. Only recommendation on interactive websites by friends (if
you have any) can do that. But then, such friends must be pleased to be
associated with you and your sorry blog; they should not feel embarrassed by it.
I wish you good luck in your further
endeavours.
Ivana Velikovna
P.S. May I suggest you repair one more
of your mistakes? My father Igor wants to know where he can get a “Sutra Waterbed”. The other day he
caught my brattish brother Hannibal, not so much red-handed as wet-handed,
with that dirty book you lend him. The
little imp babbled his way out of it (I wonder who he learned that from…?), and
made papa believe that the “Kama” in the title is actually modern texting for
“Cama” (as in Bed) and that the smut
guide was a dormitory prospectus. Now he wants to buy one for mama’s birthday.
I will not allow your lack of scruples to disrupt our family! So the red-hot
potato is in your court!
So there you have it, reader! Good won, but it was a Pyrrhic victory. Evil
lost, but there is no cause to cheer. In the end, the true victor was Indifference; that ‘strange and
unnatural state in which the lines blur between light and darkness, dusk and
dawn,’ as wise Elie Wiesel once spoke. Indifference, which is ‘not only a sin,
but a punishment.’
You can say that again!
You can say that again!
As for becoming a member of Google + or Connect of whatever ridiculous name they come up with for their android-driven thievery: never. I told you: do not sell your soul (if you have any left) to google, but you wouldn't listen. As you never did, whenever I gave you Good Advice.
ReplyDeleteAs for the Stats: I really DID visit the post with negative words. Only the google-driven statmachine wouldn't want to register me, as I have become one of the unfaithful as of late. And you know, I am always right.
Dear Jerry,
ReplyDeleteIndeed you did, but as usual: too late. You visited 1 h and 32 minutes after the tally closed. With supporters like that, who needs godchildren?
Al
Alfie, You seem to have a problem with your clock. The time recorded for my earlier comment bore no relation to the actual time of my post.
ReplyDeleteDear Colin,
ReplyDeleteI know. But what can I do? I am like the Emperor Carlos V who could not get his clocks to chime together! Is it really that important? Are you afraid people will think that you are up at 11:12 a.m.?
Your Alfred